首页 / 资料库 / 文献详情

A New Progress of the Proterozoic Chronostratigraphical Division

MeiMingxiangKyawt- KayKhaing

2016Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis SunyatseniEarth and Planetary Sciences被引 1

出版方页面 →

摘要

The Precambrian, an informal chronostratigraphical unit, represents the period of Earth history from the start of the Cambrian at ca. 541 Ma back to the formation of the planet at 4567 Ma. It was originally conceptualized as a Cryptozoic that was contrasted with the Phanerozoic Eon from the Cambrian to the Quaternary, which is now known as the Precambrian and can be subdivided into three eons, i.e., the Hadean, the Archean and the Proterozoic. The Precambrian is currently divided chronometrically into convenient boundaries, including for the establishment of the Proterozoic periods that were chosen to reflect large-scale tectonic or sedimentary features(except for the Ediacaran Period). This chronometric arrangement might represent the second progress on the study of chronostratigraphy of the Precambrian after its separation from the Phanerozoic. Upon further study of the evolutionary history of the Precambrian Earth, applying new geodynamic and geobiological knowledge and information, a revised division of Precambrian time has led to the third conceptual progress on the study of Precambrian chronostratigraphy. In the current scheme, the Proterozoic Eon began at 2500 Ma, which is the approximate time by which most granite-greenstone crust had formed, and can be subdivided into ten periods of typically 200 Ma duration grouped into three eras(except for the Ediacaran Period). Within this current scheme, the Ediacaran Period was ratified in 2004, the first period-level addition to the geologic time scale in more than a century, an important advancement in stratigraphy. There are two main problems in the current scheme of Proterozoic chronostratigraphical division:(1) the definition of the Archean–Proterozoic boundary at 2500 Ma, which does not reflect a unique time of synchronous global change in tectonic style and does not correspond with a major change in lithology;(2) the round number subdivision of the Proterozoic into several periods based on broad orogenic charac

引用本文(GB/T 7714)

Mei, Mingxiang, Kyawt, 等. A New Progress of the Proterozoic Chronostratigraphical Division[J]. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Sunyatseni, 2016.

引文网络

参考文献与被引分析加载中…

本站仅收录题录与摘要供学习参考,全文版权归属出版方;如有侵权请联系我们删除。