首页 / 资料库 / 文献详情

[Comparison of three different methods for isolating RNA from <i>Oncomelania hupensis</i>].

Shujun XuKang WangZhang MinhongWenjie ChenGuoyu GuanLiu Man-ManXu LeiSun En-Tao

2017PubMedBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology被引 1

出版方页面 →

摘要

OBJECTIVE: . METHODS: . The quality of RNA was inspected by 1% agarose gel electrophoresis. The β-acting gene was selected as the target gene for RT-PCR analysis. RESULTS: ratios of the other two methods were both lower than 2.0. The RNA extracted by the modified SDS method had the better integrity. The electrophoresis results showed that the 28S rRNA band, 18S rRNA band and 5S rRNA band were clear, and there was no obvious smear between each band. The RNA obtained by the TRIzol reagent method had no 28S rRNA band, and that obtained by the CTAB method had no 28S rRNA and 5S rRNA bands. The β-acting gene of the RNA extracted by all the three methods could be amplified by RT-PCR. The costs and time-consuming of the modified SDS method were less than those of the other two methods. CONCLUSIONS: , especially for large sample preparation.

引用本文(GB/T 7714)

Shujun Xu, Kang Wang, Zhang Minhong, 等. [Comparison of three different methods for isolating RNA from <i>Oncomelania hupensis</i>].[J]. PubMed, 2017.

引文网络

参考文献与被引分析加载中…

DOI:https://doi.org/10.16250/j.32.1374.2017027

本站仅收录题录与摘要供学习参考,全文版权归属出版方;如有侵权请联系我们删除。