首页 / 资料库 / 文献详情

[Meta-analysis of the efficacy between gemcitabine-alone and gemcitabine-based chemotherapy applied in advanced pancreatic cancer].

Kun SongBin LiWei-jia Sun

2011PubMedMedicine被引 1

出版方页面 →

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of gemcitabine (GEM) alone and gemcitabine based combination chemotherapy (GEMCOM) on advanced pancreatic cancer. METHODS: Keywords Phase III, gemcitabine and pancreatic cancer were used to search and collect Phase III-randomized references about gemcitabine and gemcitabine-based combination chemotherapy applied on advanced pancreatic cancer. A references-based meta-analysis was made to compare the efficacy between GEM and GEMCOM. Before that, test for heterogeneity was committed. Fixed effect model was used if the I(2) ≤ 50%, and random effect model was used if not. The evaluating indicators were overall response rate and 1-year survival rate. RESULTS: There were 14 randomized controlled trial (RCT) and 10 RCT enrolled in overall response rate analysis and 1-year survival rate analysis, respectively. Results of meta-analysis showed that, arm GEMCOM's overall response rate and 1-year survival rate were higher than arm GEM's (z = 2.190, P = 0.028 vs. z = 4.400, P = 0.000). The differences were significant. The biases of the results were tested by Egger-test. The tests showed that no bias exists in both of two meta-analysis (t = 0.070, P = 0.946 and t = -0.740, P = 0.483) respectively. CONCLUSION: There is a possibility that the gemcitabine-combination is more effective than the gemcitabine on overall response rate and 1-year survival rate.

引用本文(GB/T 7714)

Kun Song, Bin Li, Wei-jia Sun. [Meta-analysis of the efficacy between gemcitabine-alone and gemcitabine-based chemotherapy applied in advanced pancreatic cancer].[J]. PubMed, 2011.

引文网络

参考文献与被引分析加载中…

本站仅收录题录与摘要供学习参考,全文版权归属出版方;如有侵权请联系我们删除。